Your enquiry has been submitted
Iron Sulphite HiVeg™ Agar
Intended Use
Iron Sulphite HiVeg Agar is recommended for the detection of thermophilic anaerobic organisms causing sulphide spoilage in food.
Composition
| Ingredients | Grams/Litre |
|---|---|
| HiVeg hydrolysate | 10.0 |
| Sodium sulphite | 0.5 |
| Iron (III) Citrate | 0.5 |
| Agar | 15.0 |
Final pH (at 25°C) 7.1 ± 0.2
** Formula adjusted, standardized to suit performance parameters.
Product Profile :
| Vegetable based (Code MV) | Animal based (Code M) |
|---|---|
| MV868 | M868 |
| HiVeg hydrolysate | Casein enzymic hydrolysate |
| Recommended for | The detection of thermophilic anaerobic organisms causing sulphide spoilage in food. |
|---|---|
| Reconstitution | 26.0 g/l |
| Quantity on preparation (500g) | 19.23 L |
| (100g) | 3.84 L |
| pH (25°C) | 7.1 ± 0.2 |
| Supplement | None |
| Sterilization | 121°C / 15 minutes. |
| Storage | Dry Medium - Below 30°C, Prepared Medium 2 - 8°C. |
Directions :
Suspend 26 grams in 1000 ml distilled water. Heat to boiling to dissolve the medium completely. Sterilize by autoclaving at 15 lbs pressure (121°C) for 15 minutes.
Principle and Interpretation :
This medium is prepared by using Hiveg hydrolysate which is free from BSE/TSE risks associated with animal based peptones. Iron Sulphite HiVeg Agar is the modification of Iron Sulphite Agar which is based on formula of Cameron Sulphite Agar developed by the National Canners Association of America (1). 0.1% sulphite concentration in the original formula was reported by Beerens to be inhibitory to some strains of Clostridium sporogenes (2). This observation was later on confirmed by Mossel et al (3), who consequently showed that 0.05% sulphite concentration was not inhibitory to the organisms. For the detection of organisms causing sulphide spoilage either Deep-Shake Culture method or Attenborough and Scarr (4) method may be followed:
In Deep-Shake Culture method, the medium is dispensed in 10 ml amounts in sterile tubes. Sample is inoculated when the medium is at about 50°C and allowed to set. Further incubation is carried out at 55°C for 24-48 hours. Typical thermophilic species of Desulfotomaculum nigrificans, produces distinct black spherical colonies in the depth of the medium.
In Attenborough and Scarr (4) method, diluted samples of sugar or any other food to be tested are filtered through membrane filters. These filters are then rolled up and placed in tubes containing just sufficient Iron Sulphite HiVeg Agar (at 50°C) to cover them. The medium is allowed to set and then incubated at 55 - 56°C for 24-48 hours. After incubation, the number of black colonies on the membrane filter are counted. This membrane filter technique is quicker, of comparable accuracy and permits the examination of larger samples.
Note: The blackening reaction is only presumptive evidence of Clostridial growth. Confirmation tests must be carried out to identify the organisms growing in the medium.
Quality Control :
Appearance of powder
Yellow coloured, may have slightly greenish tinge, homogeneous, free flowing powder.
Gelling
Firm, comparable with 1.5% Agar gel.
Colour and Clarity
Yellow coloured, slightly opalescent gel forms in petri plates.
Reaction
Reaction of 2.6% w/v aqueous solution is pH 7.1 ± 0.2 at 25°C.
Cultural Response
Cultural characteristics observed after an incubation at 55 - 56°C for 24-48 hours under anaerobic conditions.
| Organisms (ATCC) | Growth | Colour of colony |
|---|---|---|
| Clostridium botulinum (25763) | luxuriant | black |
| Clostridium sporogenes (19404) | luxuriant | black |
| Desulfotomaculum nigrificans (19858) | luxuriant | black |
| Escherichia coli (25922) | good | no blackening |
| Product Name | Iron Sulphite HiVeg™ Agar |
|---|---|
| SKU | MV868 |
| Product Type | HiVeg™ |
| Physical Form | Powder |
| Origin | Animal Free (Veg) |
| Packaging type | HDPE |
| References | 1.Tanner F. W., 1944, “The Microbiology of Foods”, 2nd Ed., Garrard Press, Illinois, P. 1127.2.Beerens H., 1958, DSIR, Proc. 2nd Internat. Sym. Food Microbiol., 1957, HMSO, London, P. 235.3.Mossel D. A. A., Golstein Brouwers G. W. M. V. and de Bruin A. S., 1959, J. Path. Bacteriol., 78:290.4.Attenborough J. and Scarr M., 1957, J. Appl. Bacteriol., 20: 460. |
| Customized Product Available | No |








